Науково-інформаційний вісник Івано-Франківського університету права імені Короля Данила Галицького (Jun 2023)

Objective» and «subjective» concepts of legal interpretation in German legal doctrine

  • Yermolenko D.,
  • Udovyka L.

DOI
https://doi.org/10.33098/2078-6670.2023.15.27.2.40-46
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 15(27)
pp. 40 – 46

Abstract

Read online

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to reveal the essence of «objective» and «subjective» concepts of legal interpretation, their theoretical basis and practical application, a comparative analysis of the differences between «objective» and «subjective» concepts of legal interpretation in German legal doctrine. Methodology. The methodology includes a complex comparative analysis and generalization of the available scientific and theoretical material and the formulation of relevant conclusions and recommendations. During the research, the following methods of scientific knowledge were used: analysis of primary sources, comparative analysis, logical analysis, critical analysis, synthesis and generalization. Results. In the process of research, it was established that «objective» and «subjective» concepts of legal interpretation are important elements of German legal doctrine. Both concepts have their advantages and disadvantages, and their application depends on the context and the specific situation. It is important to ensure a balance between general principles and individual rights and interests in order to achieve a more complete and accurate interpretation of legal norms. Originality. In the course of the research, modern trends in the interpretation of law in German legal doctrine were analyzed, new approaches and ideas emerging in this field were reflected, and new theoretical approaches to understanding the «objective» and «subjective» concepts of legal interpretation in German law were proposed. Practical significance. The results of the research can be used in law-making and law-enforcement activities, which can contribute to the development of legal practice and improvement of the legal decision-making process.

Keywords