Comparison on Hysteresis Loops and Dislocation Configurations in Fatigued Face-Centered Cubic Single Crystals

Abstract

The aggregation and evolution of dislocations form different configurations, which are the preferred locations for fatigue crack initiation. To analyze the spatial distribution of the same dislocation configuration and the resulting configuration morphologies on different observation planes, several typical hysteresis loops and dislocation configurations in fatigued face-centered cubic single crystals with various orientations were compared. The crystal orientations of these specimens were determined by the electron back-scattering diffraction technique in a Cambridge S360 Scanning Electron Microscope. It is well known that dislocation ladder and wall structures, as well as patch and vein structures, are distributed on their respective observation planes, (12¯1) and (111). These correspond to the point defect direction and line defect direction of dislocations, respectively. Therefore, the wall structures on the (12¯1) and (111) planes consist of point defects and line defects, which can be defined as point walls and line walls, respectively. Furthermore, the walls on the (12¯1) plane consist of Persistent Slip Band ladders connected with each other, corresponding to the formation of deformation bands. The evolution of dislocation patterns follows a process from patch to ladder and from vein to wall. The formation of labyrinths and dislocation cells originates from the activation of different secondary slip systems. In one word, it can help us better understand the physical nature of metal fatigue and failure by studying the distribution and evolution of different configurations.

Keywords

• dislocation configurations
• cyclic deformation
• observed plane
• FCC single crystals