Journal of Infection and Public Health (May 2024)
Comparative effectiveness and mortality of colistin monotherapy versus colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections: A propensity score analysis
Abstract
Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections pose a significant threat to global health due to limited treatment options and high mortality rates. Colistin-based regimens have emerged as a primary treatment approach, but the effectiveness and mortality outcomes of colistin monotherapy versus colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy remain uncertain. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and mortality of colistin monotherapy and colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy for CRE infections. Notably, our study is the first to undertake a comprehensive examination of the effectiveness and mortality outcomes between colistin monotherapy and colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy in the context of CRE infections. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from patients diagnosed with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections at Nakornping Hospital during 2015 to 2022. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was employed to create balanced cohorts of patients receiving either colistin monotherapy or colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy. The primary outcome measure was treatment effectiveness, assessed by 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures included clinical response, mortality at the end of treatment, and microbiologic response. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were employed after applying propensity score weighting using inverse probability of weighting (IPW). Results: A total of 220 patients were included in the analysis, with 67 receiving colistin monotherapy and 153 receiving colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy. Propensity score weighting using IPW balanced the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The effectiveness of treatment, as measured by 30-day mortality, was not significantly different between the colistin monotherapy group and the colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60–3.78, p = 0.383). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the mortality at the end of treatment between the two groups (aOR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.55–2.90, p = 0.576). The clinical response (aOR = 1.48, 95% CI: 0.61–3.59, p = 0.383) and microbiologic response (aOR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.18–2.38, p = 0.527) were similar between the colistin monotherapy and colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy groups. Conclusion: The propensity score analysis among 220 matched patients showed comparable treatment effectiveness and mortality between colistin monotherapy and colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy for CRE infections. These results suggest that colistin monotherapy may be as effective as combination therapy. More prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and establish optimal CRE treatment strategies.
