Kidney Medicine (Nov 2021)

Costs of Assisted Home Dialysis: A Single-Payer Canadian Model From ManitobaPlain-Language Summary

  • Ryan J. Bamforth,
  • Alain Beaudry,
  • Thomas W. Ferguson,
  • Claudio Rigatto,
  • Navdeep Tangri,
  • Clara Bohm,
  • Paul Komenda

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 6
pp. 942 – 950.e1

Abstract

Read online

Rationale & Objective: The prevalence of kidney failure is increasing globally. Most of these patients will require life-sustaining dialysis at a substantial cost to the health care system. Assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD) and assisted home hemodialysis (HD) are potential alternatives to in-center HD and have demonstrated equivalent outcomes with respect to mortality and morbidity. We aim to describe the costs associated with assisted continuous cycling PD (CCPD) and assisted home HD. Study Design: Cost minimization model. Setting & Population: Adult incident maintenance dialysis patients in Manitoba, Canada. Intervention: Full- and partial-assist home HD and CCPD. Full-assist modalities were defined as nurse-assisted dialysis setup and takedown performed by a health care aide, whereas partial-assist modalities only included nurse-assisted setup. Additionally, full-assist home HD was evaluated under a complete care scenario with the inclusion of a health care aide remaining with the patient throughout the duration of treatment. Outcomes: Annual per-patient maintenance and training costs related to assisted and self-care home HD and CCPD, presented in 2019 Canadian dollars. Model, Perspective, & Time Frame: This model took the perspective of the Canadian public health payer using a 1-year time frame. Results: Annual total per-patient maintenance (and training) costs by modality were the following: full-assist CCPD, $75.717 (initial training costs, $301); partial-assist CCPD, $67,765 ($4,385); full-assist home HD, $47,862 ($301); partial-assist home HD, $44,650 ($14,813); and full-assist home HD (complete care), $64,659 ($301). Limitations: This model did not account for costs taken from the societal perspective or costs related to PD failure and modality switching. Additionally, this analysis reflects only costs experienced by a single center. Conclusions: Assisted home-based dialysis modalities are viable treatment options for patients from a cost perspective. Future studies to consider graduation rates to full self-care from assisted dialysis and the cost implications of respite care are needed.

Keywords