Abstract 053: Reduced‐Dose Ticagrelor Versus Full‐Dose Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel In Acute Stroke Management: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Introduction Ticagrelor use has become more prominent in acute ischemic stroke management in the presence of clopidogrel resistance(1‐2). This study compares the effectiveness of aspirin plus ticagrelor at different doses versus clopidogrel in reducing the risk of recurrent stroke and other thrombotic events without increasing the risk of bleeding. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke at a large academic comprehensive stroke center from September 1, 2020, to July 1, 2022. A total of 3 separate groups, low‐dose ticagrelor (45 mg or 60 mg twice a day), full‐dose ticagrelor (90 mg twice a day) and clopidogrel (75 mg daily) were created. We compared baseline characteristics and completed a one‐way ANOVA to analyze for outcome measures such as in‐hospital mortality, 90‐day mortality, favorable functional outcome defined as modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0‐2, at 90 days, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and asymptomatic hemorrhage (aICH) between groups. All data was analyzed via IBM SPSS v28.0. Results A total of 445 patients were included in our study. The mean age was 66.1 ± 12.8 years and the majority of patients were female (52.9%). The most common ethnicity was African American (82.9%). Sixty patients were discharged on low‐dose ticagrelor, 39 on full dose ticagrelor and 351 on clopidogrel. A total of 162/433 (36.0%) had a presumed stroke etiology of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Only 24 patients received intravenous thrombolytics (5.3%) and 47 had stent placement (10.4%). Out of 445 patients, 288 were on aspirin 81 mg at time of discharge. Of that group, 228 were on both aspirin and clopidogrel, 60 were on aspirin and low‐dose ticagrelor and 39 were on aspirin and full‐dose ticagrelor. There was no statistical significance for new or recurrent ischemic stroke between groups (low‐dose vs full‐dose vs clopidogrel) determined by one‐way ANOVA (10.0% vs. 17.9% vs. 7.8%, F(2,103) = 0.01, p=0.99). Symptomatic ICH was also similar between the groups (3.3% vs. 2.6% vs. 1.1%, F(2,101) = 0.68, p=0.51). There was no significance for favorable functional outcomes and mortality as well (26.7% vs. 23.1% vs. 24.2%, F(2,173) = 0.62, p=0.54; 80.0% vs. 79.5% vs. 81.5%, F(2,150) = 1.5, p=0.22). Conclusion These findings suggest that a lower dose of ticagrelor may be a safe and effective alternative to full dose ticagrelor or clopidogrel for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke without increasing hemorrhagic complications. Larger randomized trials are necessary to further evaluate these findings.