Cerebrovascular Pressure Reactivity Measures: Index Comparison and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Treated According to an Intracranial Pressure?Focused Management: Rejection of the Null Hypothesis

Abstract

The aim was to investigate whether the pressure reactivity indices PRx, long-PRx (L-PRx), and pressure reactivity (PR) are interchangeable as measures of vascular reactivity, and whether they correlate with clinical outcome when an intracranial pressure (ICP)-targeted treatment regimen is applied in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Patients with TBI (n?=?29) that arrived at the hospital within 24?h of injury were included. PRx and L-PRx were derived from Pearson correlations between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and ICP over a short- and long-time interval. PR was the regression coefficient between the hourly mean values of ICP and MAP. Indices were compared to each other, parameters at admission, and outcome assessed by the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) at 6 and 12 months. PRx and L-PRx had the strongest correlation with each other (R?=?0.536, p?<?0.01). A correlation was also noted between L-PRx and PR (R?=?0.475, p?<?0.01), but not between PRx and PR. A correlation was found between age and PRx (R?=?0.482, p?=?0.01). No association with outcome for any of the indices was found. PRx/L-PRx and L-PRx/PR were moderately correlated with each other. Age was associated with PRx. None of the indices correlated with outcome when our ICP treatment regime was applied. Part of our null hypothesis, that the three indices are associated with outcome, must be rejected. There was, however, an association between some of the indices. To further understand the relation of treatment regimes and pressure reactivity indices, a larger, randomized study is warranted.

Keywords

• neurointensive care
• neurosurgery
• pressure reactivity indices
• traumatic brain injury