PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Retrospective analysis of real-world data to evaluate actionability of a comprehensive molecular profiling panel in solid tumor tissue samples (REALM study).

  • Karen Leroy,
  • Clarisse Audigier Valette,
  • Jérôme Alexandre,
  • Lise Boussemart,
  • Jean Chiesa,
  • Clotilde Deldycke,
  • Carlos Gomez-Rocca,
  • Antoine Hollebecque,
  • Jacqueline Lehmann-Che,
  • Antoinette Lemoine,
  • Sandrine Mansard,
  • Jacques Medioni,
  • Isabelle Monnet,
  • Samia Mourah,
  • Thomas Pierret,
  • Dominique Spaëth,
  • Alexandre Civet,
  • Sandrine Galoin,
  • Antoine Italiano

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291495
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 9
p. e0291495

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionConsidering the growing interest in matched cancer treatment, our aim was to evaluate the ability of a comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay to propose at least one targeted therapy given an identified genomic alteration or signature (actionability), and to collect the treatment modifications based on the CGP test results in clinical practise for solid tumors.MethodsThis retrospective, multicentre French study was conducted among 25 centres that participated in a free of charge program between 2017 and 2019 for a tissue CGP test. Data were collected on the patient, disease, tumor genomic profile, treatment suggested in the report (related to the genomic profile results) and subsequent therapeutic decisions according to the physician's declaration.ResultsAmong the 416 patients, most had lung cancer (35.6%), followed by biliary tract cancer (11.5%) or rare cancers (11.1%); 75% had a metastatic disease. The actionability was 75.0% (95% CI [70.6%-78.9%]) for all patients, 85.1% and 78.4%, respectively in lung cancer and metastatic patients. After exclusion of clinical trial suggestions, the actionability decreased to 62.3% (95% CI [57.5%-66.8%]). Treatment modification based on the test results was observed in 17.3% of the patients and was more frequent in metastatic disease (OR = 2.73, 95% CI [1.31-5.71], p = 0.007). The main reasons for no treatment modification were poor general condition (33.2%) and stable disease or remission (30.2%). The genomic-directed treatment changes were performed mostly during the first six months after the CGP test, and interestingly a substantial part was observed from six to 24 months after the genomic profiling.ConclusionThis French study provides information on the real-life actionability of a CGP test based on tissue samples, and trends to confirm its utility in clinical practice across the course of the disease, in particularly for patients with lung cancer and/or advanced disease.