Nutrients (Apr 2024)

Effects of Different Types of Intermittent Fasting Interventions on Metabolic Health in Healthy Individuals (EDIF): A Randomised Trial with a Controlled-Run in Phase

  • Daniel Herz,
  • Sebastian Karl,
  • Johannes Weiß,
  • Paul Zimmermann,
  • Sandra Haupt,
  • Rebecca Tanja Zimmer,
  • Janis Schierbauer,
  • Nadine Bianca Wachsmuth,
  • Maximilian Paul Erlmann,
  • Tobias Niedrist,
  • Kayvan Khoramipour,
  • Thomas Voit,
  • Sian Rilstone,
  • Harald Sourij,
  • Othmar Moser

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16081114
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 8
p. 1114

Abstract

Read online

The effects of intermittent fasting (IF) on health promotion in the healthy population remain controversial. Therefore, our study aimed to analyse the efficacy and feasibility of different IF protocols and evaluated the effects within a cohort with a controlled-run in phase on the body mass index (BMI) as the primary outcome, the body composition, and metabolic and haematological markers in healthy participants. A total of 25 individuals were randomised into three fasting groups: 16/8 fasting (n = 11), 20/4 fasting (n = 6), and alternate-day fasting (ADF, n = 8). Assessments were conducted at baseline (visit 1), after a four-week controlled-run in phase (visit 2), and after eight weeks of fasting (visit 3). Both the BMI (p = 0.01) and bodyweight (p = 0.01) were significantly reduced in the ADF group, which was not seen in the 16/8 and 20/4 groups (p > 0.05). Adherence was different but not statistically among the groups (16/8: 84.5 ± 23.0%; 20/4: 92.7 ± 9.5%; and ADF: 78.1 ± 33.5%, p = 0.57). Based on our obtained results, the data suggest that some fasting interventions might be promising for metabolic health. However, adherence to the specific fasting protocols remains challenging even for the healthy population.

Keywords