RMD Open (Jul 2024)

Effectiveness of secukinumab in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a European routine-care observational study

  • Bente Glintborg,
  • Merete Lund Hetland,
  • Tore K Kvien,
  • Brigitte Michelsen,
  • Florenzo Iannone,
  • Karel Pavelka,
  • Ziga Rotar,
  • Maria Jose Santos,
  • Catalin Codreanu,
  • Anne Gitte Loft,
  • Maria Sole Chimenti,
  • Gary J Macfarlane,
  • Gareth T Jones,
  • Mikkel Østergaard,
  • Jakub Zavada,
  • Bjorn Gudbjornsson,
  • Gerður Gröndal,
  • Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg,
  • Adrian Ciurea,
  • Daniela Di Giuseppe,
  • Michael J Nissen,
  • Anabela Barcelos,
  • Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma,
  • Sara Nysom Christiansen,
  • Isabel Castrejón,
  • Sella Aarrestad Provan,
  • Heikki Relas,
  • Simon Horskjær Rasmussen,
  • Ismail Sari,
  • Anna-Mari Hokkanen,
  • Johan K Wallman,
  • Sigrid Vorobjov,
  • Marion Pons,
  • Marleen van de Sande,
  • Corina Mogosan,
  • Lucia Otero-Varela,
  • Karin Laas,
  • Yesim Erez,
  • Katja Perdan Pirkmajer

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004166
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 3

Abstract

Read online

Objectives To compare the treatment effectiveness of secukinumab in radiographic (r) versus non-radiographic (nr) axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients treated in routine care across Europe.Methods Prospectively collected data on secukinumab-treated axSpA patients with known radiographic status were pooled from nine countries.Remission rates based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs; Numeric Rating Scale (0–10), for example, pain ≤2/Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) ≤2 and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive disease (ID) <1.3 after 6/12/24 months of secukinumab treatment were calculated.Remission and drug retention rates in r-axSpA versus nr-axSpA patients were compared by logistic and Cox regression models (unadjusted/adjusted for age+sex/adjusted for multiple confounders).Results Overall, 1161 secukinumab-treated patients were included (r-axSpA/nr-axSpA: 922/239). At baseline, r-axSpA patients had longer disease duration and higher C reactive protein, were more often male and HLA-B27 positive and had received fewer prior biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs compared with nr-axSpA patients, whereas PROs were largely similar.During follow-up, crude PRO remission rates were significantly higher in r-axSpA compared with nr-axSpA patients (6 months: pain≤2: 40%/28%, OR=1.7; BASDAI≤2: 37%/25%, OR=1.8), as were drug retention rates (24 months: 66%/58%, HR 0.73 (ref: r-axSpA)). Proportions of patients achieving ASDAS ID were low for both groups, particularly nr-axSpA (6 months: 11%/8%).However, when adjusting for age+sex, these differences diminished, and after adjusting for multiple confounders, no significant between-group differences remained for either remission or drug retention rates.Conclusion Crude remission/drug retention rates in European secukinumab-treated patients were higher in r-axSpA compared with nr-axSpA patients. In adjusted analyses, secukinumab effectiveness was similar in both groups, suggesting that observed differences were related to factors other than radiographic status.