Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry (Sep 2018)
A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing the Efficacies of Eleven Novel Therapies with the Common Salvage Regimen for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Abstract
Background/Aims: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a relapsed and refractory hematological malignancy with a lower morbidity but higher mortality. In addition to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, chemotherapy is used as the front-line treatment. However, the diversity of available agents and the inconsistency of outcomes of relevant trials render treatment decision-making tough. Network meta-analysis (NMA) is an efficient statistical framework that makes a comprehensive comparison and provides a valuable clinical reference. Methods: All the potential trials were retrieved from the medical database and screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The main characteristics of each trial as well as the primary outcomes, including complete remission (CR), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS), were extracted. In addition, the network graph was plotted to illustrate the connections among the trials involved. Comparison results in the network were exhibited in a forest plot. Furthermore, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was introduced to rank the treatments for each endpoint. Results: A total of 11 trials were selected from 1,625 identifications. No significant difference in the common treatment was observed for the endpoints CR and ORR. In terms of OS, CPX-351 (HR: 0.77, 95% CrI: 0.63, 0.94) and HiDAC plus MK-8776 (HR: 0.80, 95% CrI: 0.68, 0.93) showed a superiority over the common salvage regimen in the short term, while HiDAC plus MK-8776 (HR: 0.80, 95% CrI: 0.70, 0.93) and Ara-C plus vosaroxin (HR: 0.86, 95% CrI: 0.74, 0.99) outperformed the common salvage regimen for the 3-year OS. In addition, clofarabine plus Ara-C (HR: 0.61, 95% CrI: 0.53, 0.69) and CPX-351 (HR: 0.71, 95% CrI: 0.60, 0.83) were confirmed to be efficacious in enhancing the rate of EFS. Conclusion: Referring to the network outcome and SUCRA value, clofarabine plus Ara-C (CR: 79.05%, ORR: 80.02%) and Ara-C plus vosaroxin (CR: 75.42%, ORR: 73.43%) were potentially the top two choices for both CR and ORR. CPX-351 (1-year OS: 91.36%), HiDAC plus MK-8776 (3-year OS: 94.23%) and clofarabine plus Ara-C (1-year EFS: 97.34%) yielded the highest probabilities to be the optimal choices for 1-year OS, 3-year OS and 1-year EFS, respectively.
Keywords
