Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (Jun 2019)

Age, Height, and Sex on Motor Evoked Potentials: Translational Data From a Large Italian Cohort in a Clinical Environment

  • Mariagiovanna Cantone,
  • Giuseppe Lanza,
  • Giuseppe Lanza,
  • Luisa Vinciguerra,
  • Valentina Puglisi,
  • Riccardo Ricceri,
  • Francesco Fisicaro,
  • Carla Vagli,
  • Rita Bella,
  • Raffaele Ferri,
  • Giovanni Pennisi,
  • Vincenzo Di Lazzaro,
  • Manuela Pennisi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00185
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionMotor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are known to be susceptible to several sources of variability. However, conflicting evidences on individual characteristics in relatively small sample sizes have been reported. We investigated the effect of age, height, and sex on MEPs of the motor cortex and spinal roots in a large cohort.MethodsA total of 587 subjects clinically and neuroradiologically intact were included. MEPs were recorded during mild tonic contraction through a circular coil applied over the “hot spot” of the first dorsal interosseous and tibialis anterior muscles (TAs), bilaterally. Central motor conduction time (CMCT) was estimated as the difference between MEP cortical latency and the peripheral motor conduction time (PMCT) by cervical or lumbar magnetic stimulation. Peak-to-peak MEP amplitude to cortical stimulation and right-to-left difference of each parameter were also measured.ResultsAfter Bonferroni correction, general linear (multiple) regression analysis showed that both MEP cortical latency and PMCT at four limbs positively correlated with age and height. At lower limbs, an independent effect of sex on the same measures was also observed (with females showing smaller values than males). CMCT correlated with both age (negatively) and height (positively) when analyzed by a single regression; however, with a multiple regression analysis this significance disappeared, due to the correction for the multicollinearity within the dataset.ConclusionPhysical individual features need to be considered for a more accurate and meaningful MEPs interpretation. Both in clinical practice and in research setting, patients and controls should be matched for age, height, and sex.

Keywords