Frontiers in Oncology (Mar 2024)
Preoperative differentiation of gastric schwannomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on computed tomography: a retrospective multicenter observational study
Abstract
IntroductionGastric schwannoma is a rare benign tumor accounting for only 1–2% of alimentary tract mesenchymal tumors. Owing to their low incidence rate, most cases are misdiagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), especially tumors with a diameter of less than 5 cm. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a diagnostic nomogram based on computed tomography (CT) imaging features for the preoperative prediction of gastric schwannomas and GISTs (diameters = 2–5 cm).MethodsGastric schwannomas in 47 patients and GISTs in 230 patients were confirmed by surgical pathology. Thirty-four patients with gastric schwannomas and 167 with GISTs admitted between June 2009 and August 2022 at Hospital 1 were retrospectively analyzed as the test and training sets, respectively. Seventy-six patients (13 with gastric schwannomas and 63 with GISTs) were included in the external validation set (June 2017 to September 2022 at Hospital 2). The independent factors for differentiating gastric schwannomas from GISTs were obtained by multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a corresponding nomogram model was established. The accuracy of the nomogram was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic and calibration curves.ResultsLogistic regression analysis showed that the growth pattern (odds ratio [OR] 3.626; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.105–11.900), absence of necrosis (OR 4.752; 95% CI 1.464–15.424), presence of tumor-associated lymph nodes (OR 23.978; 95% CI 6.499–88.466), the difference between CT values during the portal and arterial phases (OR 1.117; 95% CI 1.042–1.198), and the difference between CT values during the delayed and portal phases (OR 1.159; 95% CI 1.080–1.245) were independent factors in differentiating gastric schwannoma from GIST. The resulting individualized prediction nomogram showed good discrimination in the training (area under the curve [AUC], 0.937; 95% CI, 0.900–0.973) and validation (AUC, 0.921; 95% CI, 0.830–1.000) datasets. The calibration curve showed that the probability of gastric schwannomas predicted using the nomogram agreed well with the actual value.ConclusionThe proposed nomogram model based on CT imaging features can be used to differentiate gastric schwannoma from GIST before surgery.
Keywords
