Journal of Clinical Medicine (Oct 2022)

Troponin in COVID-19: To Measure or Not to Measure? Insights from a Prospective Cohort Study

  • Renata Moll-Bernardes,
  • João D. Mattos,
  • Eduardo B. Schaustz,
  • Andréa S. Sousa,
  • Juliana R. Ferreira,
  • Mariana B. Tortelly,
  • Adriana M. L. Pimentel,
  • Ana Cristina B. S. Figueiredo,
  • Marcia M. Noya-Rabelo,
  • Allan R. K. Sales,
  • Denilson C. Albuquerque,
  • Paulo H. Rosado-de-Castro,
  • Gabriel C. Camargo,
  • Olga F. Souza,
  • Fernando A. Bozza,
  • Emiliano Medei,
  • Ronir R. Luiz

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195951
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 19
p. 5951

Abstract

Read online

Myocardial injury (MI), defined by troponin elevation, has been associated with increased mortality and adverse outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the role of this biomarker as a risk predictor remains unclear. Data from adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were recorded prospectively. A multiple logistic regression model was used to quantify associations of all variables with in-hospital mortality, including the calculation of odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CI). Troponin measurement was performed in 1476 of 4628 included patients, and MI was detected in 353 patients, with a prevalence of 23.9%; [95% CI, 21.8–26.1%]. The total in-hospital mortality rate was 10.9% [95% CI, 9.8–12.0%]. The mortality was much higher among patients with MI than among those without MI, with a prevalence of 22.7% [95% CI, 18.5–27.3%] vs. 5.5% [95% CI, 4.3–7.0%] and increased with each troponin level. After adjustment for age and comorbidities, the model revealed that the mortality risk was greater for patients with MI [OR = 2.99; 95% CI, 2.06–4.36%], and for those who did not undergo troponin measurement [OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.62–2.97%], compared to those without MI. Our data support the role of troponin as an important risk predictor for these patients, capable of discriminating between those with a low or increased mortality rate. In addition, our findings suggest that this biomarker has a remarkable negative predictive value in COVID-19.

Keywords