World Journal of Emergency Surgery (Feb 2022)

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence in emergency and trauma surgery, the ARIES project: an international web-based survey

  • Belinda De Simone,
  • Fikri M. Abu-Zidan,
  • Andrew A. Gumbs,
  • Elie Chouillard,
  • Salomone Di Saverio,
  • Massimo Sartelli,
  • Federico Coccolini,
  • Luca Ansaloni,
  • Toby Collins,
  • Yoram Kluger,
  • Ernest E. Moore,
  • Andrej Litvin,
  • Ari Leppaniemi,
  • Pietro Mascagni,
  • Luca Milone,
  • Micaela Piccoli,
  • Mohamed Abu-Hilal,
  • Michael Sugrue,
  • Walter L. Biffl,
  • Fausto Catena

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00413-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Aim We aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practices in the application of AI in the emergency setting among international acute care and emergency surgeons. Methods An online questionnaire composed of 30 multiple choice and open-ended questions was sent to the members of the World Society of Emergency Surgery between 29th May and 28th August 2021. The questionnaire was developed by a panel of 11 international experts and approved by the WSES steering committee. Results 200 participants answered the survey, 32 were females (16%). 172 (86%) surgeons thought that AI will improve acute care surgery. Fifty surgeons (25%) were trained, robotic surgeons and can perform it. Only 19 (9.5%) were currently performing it. 126 (63%) surgeons do not have a robotic system in their institution, and for those who have it, it was mainly used for elective surgery. Only 100 surgeons (50%) were able to define different AI terminology. Participants thought that AI is useful to support training and education (61.5%), perioperative decision making (59.5%), and surgical vision (53%) in emergency surgery. There was no statistically significant difference between males and females in ability, interest in training or expectations of AI (p values 0.91, 0.82, and 0.28, respectively, Mann–Whitney U test). Ability was significantly correlated with interest and expectations (p < 0.0001 Pearson rank correlation, rho 0.42 and 0.47, respectively) but not with experience (p = 0.9, rho − 0.01). Conclusions The implementation of artificial intelligence in the emergency and trauma setting is still in an early phase. The support of emergency and trauma surgeons is essential for the progress of AI in their setting which can be augmented by proper research and training programs in this area.

Keywords