PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Assessment of four in vitro phenotypic biofilm detection methods in relation to antimicrobial resistance in aerobic clinical bacterial isolates.

  • Ajaya Basnet,
  • Basanta Tamang,
  • Mahendra Raj Shrestha,
  • Lok Bahadur Shrestha,
  • Junu Richhinbung Rai,
  • Rajendra Maharjan,
  • Sushila Dahal,
  • Pradip Shrestha,
  • Shiba Kumar Rai

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294646
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 11
p. e0294646

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionThe lack of standardized methods for detecting biofilms continues to pose a challenge to microbiological diagnostics since biofilm-mediated infections induce persistent and recurrent infections in humans that often defy treatment with common antibiotics. This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic parameters of four in vitro phenotypic biofilm detection assays in relation to antimicrobial resistance in aerobic clinical bacterial isolates.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, bacterial strains from clinical samples were isolated and identified following the standard microbiological guidelines. The antibiotic resistance profile was assessed through the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Biofilm formation was detected by gold standard tissue culture plate method (TCPM), tube method (TM), Congo red agar (CRA), and modified Congo red agar (MCRA). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.0, with a significant association considered at pResultAmong the total isolates (n = 226), TCPM detected 140 (61.95%) biofilm producers, with CoNS (9/9) (pConclusionIt is suggested that TM be used for biofilm detection, after TCPM. Unlike MCRA, black pigmentation in colonies formed on CRA declined with time. MDR- and XDR-biofilm formers were frequent among the clinical isolates.