Bone & Joint Open (Nov 2020)

The use of biologics in professional and Olympic sport: a scoping review protocol

  • Navnit S. Makaram,
  • Iain R. Murray,
  • Scott A. Rodeo,
  • Seth L. Sherman,
  • Andrew D. Murray,
  • Fares S. Haddad,
  • Timothy R. McAdams,
  • Geoffrey D. Abrams

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.111.BJO-2020-0159
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 1, no. 11
pp. 715 – 719

Abstract

Read online

Aims: The use of biologics in the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries in Olympic and professional athletes appears to be increasing. There are no studies which currently map the extent, range, and nature of existing literature concerning the use and efficacy of such therapies in this arena. The objective of this scoping review is to map the available evidence regarding the use of biologics in the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries in Olympic and professional sport. Methods: Best-practice methodological frameworks suggested by Arksey and O’Malley, Levac et al, and the Joanna Briggs Institute will be used. This scoping review will aim to firstly map the current extent, range, and nature of evidence for biologic strategies to treat injuries in professional and Olympic sport; secondly, to summarize and disseminate existing research findings; and thirdly, to identify gaps in existing literature. A three-step search strategy will identify peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed literature, including reviews, original research, and both published and unpublished (‘grey’) literature. An initial limited search will identify suitable search terms, followed by a search of five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) using keyword and index terms. Studies will be screened independently by two reviewers for final inclusion. Dissemination: We will chart key concepts and evidence, and disseminate existing research findings to practitioners and clinicians, through both peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed literature, online platforms (including social media), conference, and in-person communications. We will identify gaps in current literature and priorities for further study.

Keywords