BMC Gastroenterology (Aug 2021)

Intensive surveillance endoscopy for multiple gastrointestinal tumors in a patient with constitutional mismatch repair deficiency: case report

  • Takayuki Ando,
  • Takahiko Nakajima,
  • Rei Fukuda,
  • Keiko Nomura,
  • Yo Niida,
  • Miho Sakumura,
  • Iori Motoo,
  • Hiroshi Mihara,
  • Sohachi Nanjo,
  • Shinya Kajiura,
  • Haruka Fujinami,
  • Shojo Hojo,
  • Tsutomu Fujii,
  • Ichiro Yasuda

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01902-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) is an extremely rare autosomal recessive hereditary disease characterized by the absence of mismatch repair gene activity from birth, which results in brain tumors, colonic polyposis, gastrointestinal cancers, and lymphomas later in life. An aggressive approach, including colectomy or proctocolectomy, is recommended for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Additionally, partial colectomy with subsequent endoscopic surveillance may be an alternative strategy due to poor patient’s condition, although there is no evidence of surveillance endoscopy after partial colectomy for CMMRD. Case presentation A 13-year-old male patient with a history of T-lymphoblastic lymphoma underwent total gastrointestinal endoscopy, which revealed rectal cancer, colorectal polyposis, and duodenal adenoma. Differential diagnosis included constitutional mismatch repair deficiency according to its scoring system and microsatellite instability, and subsequent germline mutation testing for mismatch repair genes confirmed the diagnosis of constitutional mismatch repair deficiency based on a homozygous mutation in mutS homolog 6 (MSH6). The patient and his family refused colectomy due to the high risk of malignancies other than colorectal cancer, which could require radical surgery. Therefore, the patient underwent low anterior resection of the rectosigmoid colon for rectal cancer and intensive surveillance endoscopy for the remaining colon polyposis. During the 3-year period after initial surgery, 130 polyps were removed and the number of polyps gradually decreased during 6-months interval surveillance endoscopies, although only one polyp was diagnosed as invasive adenocarcinoma (pT1). Conclusions Our experience of short surveillance endoscopy illustrates that this strategy might be one of options according to patient’s condition.

Keywords