Remote Psychotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study on the Changes Experienced by Austrian Psychotherapists
Michael Stadler,
Andrea Jesser,
Elke Humer,
Barbara Haid,
Peter Stippl,
Wolfgang Schimböck,
Elisabeth Maaß,
Helmut Schwanzar,
Daniela Leithner,
Christoph Pieh,
Thomas Probst
Affiliations
Michael Stadler
Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria
Andrea Jesser
Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria
Elke Humer
Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria
Barbara Haid
Austrian Federal Association for Psychotherapy, 1030 Vienna, Austria
Peter Stippl
Austrian Federal Association for Psychotherapy, 1030 Vienna, Austria
Wolfgang Schimböck
Austrian Federal Association for Psychotherapy, 1030 Vienna, Austria
Elisabeth Maaß
Österreichische Gesellschaft Für Wissenschaftliche, Klientenzentrierte Psychotherapie und Personorientierte Gesprächsführung (ÖGWG), 4020 Linz, Austria
Helmut Schwanzar
Österreichische Gesellschaft Für Wissenschaftliche, Klientenzentrierte Psychotherapie und Personorientierte Gesprächsführung (ÖGWG), 4020 Linz, Austria
Daniela Leithner
Österreichische Gesellschaft Für Wissenschaftliche, Klientenzentrierte Psychotherapie und Personorientierte Gesprächsführung (ÖGWG), 4020 Linz, Austria
Christoph Pieh
Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria
Thomas Probst
Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria
The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated measures to contain the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus required a change in treatment format from face-to-face to remote psychotherapy. This study investigated the changes experienced by Austrian therapists when switching to psychotherapy at a distance. A total of 217 therapists participated in an online survey on changes experienced when switching settings. The survey was open from 26 June until 3 September 2020. Several open questions were evaluated using qualitative content analysis. The results show that the setting at a distance was appreciated by the therapists as a possibility to continue therapy even during an exceptional situation. Moreover, remote therapy offered the respondents more flexibility in terms of space and time. Nevertheless, the therapists also reported challenges of remote therapy, such as limited sensory perceptions, technical problems and signs of fatigue. They also described differences in terms of the therapeutic interventions used. There was a great deal of ambivalence in the data regarding the intensity of sessions and the establishment and/or maintenance of a psychotherapeutic relationship. Overall, the study shows that remote psychotherapy seems to have been well accepted by Austrian psychotherapists in many settings and can offer benefits. Clinical studies are also necessary to investigate in which contexts and for which patient groups the remote setting is suitable and where it is potentially contraindicated.