Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (Mar 2018)

Interlaboratory comparison of <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and <i>δ</i>D measurements of atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> for combined use of data sets from different laboratories

  • T. Umezawa,
  • T. Umezawa,
  • C. A. M. Brenninkmeijer,
  • T. Röckmann,
  • C. van der Veen,
  • S. C. Tyler,
  • S. C. Tyler,
  • R. Fujita,
  • S. Morimoto,
  • S. Morimoto,
  • S. Aoki,
  • T. Sowers,
  • J. Schmitt,
  • M. Bock,
  • J. Beck,
  • H. Fischer,
  • S. E. Michel,
  • B. H. Vaughn,
  • J. B. Miller,
  • J. W. C. White,
  • G. Brailsford,
  • H. Schaefer,
  • P. Sperlich,
  • W. A. Brand,
  • M. Rothe,
  • T. Blunier,
  • D. Lowry,
  • R. E. Fisher,
  • E. G. Nisbet,
  • A. L. Rice,
  • P. Bergamaschi,
  • C. Veidt,
  • I. Levin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1207-2018
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11
pp. 1207 – 1231

Abstract

Read online

We report results from a worldwide interlaboratory comparison of samples among laboratories that measure (or measured) stable carbon and hydrogen isotope ratios of atmospheric CH4 (δ13C-CH4 and δD-CH4). The offsets among the laboratories are larger than the measurement reproducibility of individual laboratories. To disentangle plausible measurement offsets, we evaluated and critically assessed a large number of intercomparison results, some of which have been documented previously in the literature. The results indicate significant offsets of δ13C-CH4 and δD-CH4 measurements among data sets reported from different laboratories; the differences among laboratories at modern atmospheric CH4 level spread over ranges of 0.5 ‰ for δ13C-CH4 and 13 ‰ for δD-CH4. The intercomparison results summarized in this study may be of help in future attempts to harmonize δ13C-CH4 and δD-CH4 data sets from different laboratories in order to jointly incorporate them into modelling studies. However, establishing a merged data set, which includes δ13C-CH4 and δD-CH4 data from multiple laboratories with desirable compatibility, is still challenging due to differences among laboratories in instrument settings, correction methods, traceability to reference materials and long-term data management. Further efforts are needed to identify causes of the interlaboratory measurement offsets and to decrease those to move towards the best use of available δ13C-CH4 and δD-CH4 data sets.