Analysis of Different Opinions on the Prohibition or Ijtihad of the "Calligraphy of the Holy Quran"

Abstract

AbstractThis study has been written after studying the opinions of those who believe in the Qur'an and the alphabet and examining how these two opinions interact with each other, in a descriptive-analytical manner with the aim of discovering the principles and criteria of the opinions about the confiscation and ijtihad of the Qur'anic script. The importance of drawing and recording the Qur'an, on the other hand, and examining and criticizing the arguments of those who believe in the seizure or ijtihad of the Qur'anic tradition, raised the question of what principles and arguments the two groups in question express their views on? And what is the preferred opinion?Belief in the confiscation or ijtihad of the Qur'anic Qur'an is one of the most important issues in the field of Qur'anic studies. Those who believe in the prohibition of the Mus'haf tradition consider any change in the way the Qur'anic Mus'hafs are written as unauthorized and as a distortion of the words of the Qur'an, and for this purpose, they cite evidence. In contrast, there is the theory of ijtihad of the Qur'anic script, which in order to facilitate the reading of non-Arabic languages, especially for beginners, allows a change in the script and suggests writing the Qur'an based on the deductive pattern. Examining the theoretical foundations and criticizing and analyzing the arguments presented shows the lack of authenticity of the confiscation of the Mus'haf tradition

Keywords

• keywords: holy quran
• quranic tradition
• deductive drawing
• confiscation
• distortion