No difference in stability among various knee flexion angles during fixation of anterolateral ligament reconstruction or lateral extra‐articular tenodesis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of biomechanical studies

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) or lateral extra‐articular tenodesis (LET) fixation at low versus high flexion angles during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) on rotation or translational knee stability. Methods The inclusion criteria for this study were (1) cadaveric study, (2) cadaveric specimens underwent ACLR, (3) cadaveric specimen underwent ALLR or LET and (4) specimen preparation technique described the knee flexion angle at the time of ALLR or LET tensioning and fixation. A priori, ‘low flexion’ was defined as 0–30° and ‘high flexion’ was defined as 60–90° at graft fixation. Main outcomes of interest included internal rotation and anterior translation. Results Data from 92 cadaveric knees (from 9 studies) were extracted and included in the meta‐analysis. The mean pooled value for internal rotation was 10.1° (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7–14.5°) for the low flexion group and 11.5° (95% CI, 7.4–15.7°) for the high flexion group (n.s.). The mean pooled value for anterior translation was 4.3 mm (95% CI, 0.5–8.1 mm) for the low flexion group and 3.0 mm (95% CI, 1.1–5.0 mm) for the high flexion group (n.s.). Conclusion This meta‐analysis of existing biomechanical research found that the rotational and translational stability of the knee were not significantly different between scenarios in which ALLR or LET fixation was performed at low knee flexion angles (0–30°) versus high knee flexion angles (60–90°). Level of Evidence Level IV.

Keywords

• anterior cruciate ligament
• anterolateral ligament reconstruction
• anterior translation
• flexion angle
• internal rotation
• lateral extra‐articular tenodesis