PLoS ONE (Jan 2017)

The spectral features of EEG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex depend on the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials.

  • Matteo Fecchio,
  • Andrea Pigorini,
  • Angela Comanducci,
  • Simone Sarasso,
  • Silvia Casarotto,
  • Isabella Premoli,
  • Chiara-Camilla Derchi,
  • Alice Mazza,
  • Simone Russo,
  • Federico Resta,
  • Fabio Ferrarelli,
  • Maurizio Mariotti,
  • Ulf Ziemann,
  • Marcello Massimini,
  • Mario Rosanova

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184910
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 9
p. e0184910

Abstract

Read online

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) can excite both cortico-cortical and cortico-spinal axons resulting in TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), respectively. Despite this remarkable difference with other cortical areas, the influence of motor output and its amplitude on TEPs is largely unknown. Here we studied TEPs resulting from M1 stimulation and assessed whether their waveform and spectral features depend on the MEP amplitude. To this aim, we performed two separate experiments. In experiment 1, single-pulse TMS was applied at the same supra-threshold intensity on primary motor, prefrontal, premotor and parietal cortices and the corresponding TEPs were compared by means of local mean field power and time-frequency spectral analysis. In experiment 2 we stimulated M1 at resting motor threshold in order to elicit MEPs characterized by a wide range of amplitudes. TEPs computed from high-MEP and low-MEP trials were then compared using the same methods applied in experiment 1. In line with previous studies, TMS of M1 produced larger TEPs compared to other cortical stimulations. Notably, we found that only TEPs produced by M1 stimulation were accompanied by a late event-related desynchronization (ERD-peaking at ~300 ms after TMS), whose magnitude was strongly dependent on the amplitude of MEPs. Overall, these results suggest that M1 produces peculiar responses to TMS possibly reflecting specific anatomo-functional properties, such as the re-entry of proprioceptive feedback associated with target muscle activation.