Differential adoption of castration‐resistant prostate cancer treatment across facilities in a national healthcare system

Abstract

Abstract Background Over the past decade, abiraterone and enzalutamide have largely replaced ketoconazole as oral treatments for castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We investigated the differential adoption of abiraterone and enzalutamide across facilities in a national healthcare system to understand the impact a facility has on the receipt of these novel therapies. Methods Using data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse, we identified a cohort of men with CRPC who received the most common first‐line therapies: abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, or ketoconazole between 2010 and 2017. We described variability in the adoption of abiraterone and enzalutamide across facilities by time period (2010–2013 or 2014–2017). We categorized facilities depending on the timing of adoption of abiraterone and enzalutamide relative to other facilities and described facility characteristics associated with early and late adoption. Results We identified 4998 men treated with ketoconazole, docetaxel, abiraterone, or enzalutamide as first‐line CRPC therapy between 2010 and 2017 at 125 national facilities. When limiting the cohort to oral therapies, most patients treated earlier in the study period (2010–2013) received ketoconazole. A dramatic shift was seen by the second half of the study period (2014–2017) with most men treated with first‐line abiraterone (61%). Despite this shift and a new standard of care, some facilities persisted in the widespread use of ketoconazole in the later period, so‐called late adopting facilities. After multivariable adjustment, patients who received treatment at a late adopting facility were more likely receiving care at a lower complexity, rural facility, with less urology and hematology/oncology workforce (all p < 0.01). Conclusion Many facilities persisted in their use of ketoconazole as first‐line CRPC therapy, even when other facilities had adopted the new standard of care abiraterone and enzalutamide. Further work is needed to identify the effect of this late adoption on outcomes important to patients.

Keywords

• adoption of technology
• facility
• prostate cancer
• rural care
• variation in care