Proceedings (Jan 2024)
Comparing Breastfeeding Outcomes of Australian Women Who Birth by Elective and Non-Elective Caesarean Section
Abstract
Caesarean section birth (CS) accounts for 38% of Australian births and is known to negatively impact breastfeeding exclusivity and duration. Comparison of breastfeeding outcomes between elective (ELUSCS) and non-elective lower uterine segment caesarean section (NELUSCS) births is needed to inform clinical care. Secondary analysis was performed on data from Australian women who had birthed by CS within the previous 12 months and completed an anonymous online questionnaire. Women responded to items relating to CS birth type and feeding methods immediately post birth, during the hospital stay and in the first 2 weeks at home. Self-reported pain at those time points was rated using a scale of 0–10 with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. Associations between CS birth type, pain scores and feeding methods were determined, and breastfeeding prevalence at the time of survey completion examined. Our sample consisted of 851 women at 5 ± 3.5 months postpartum, of which 435 (51.1%) were primiparous and 362 (42%) had a NELUSCS birth. Infants born by NELUSCS were more likely to receive formula (37.1% vs. 28.8% ELUSCS, p = 0.024) and less likely to be breastfed (78.6% vs. 85.9% ELUSCS, p = 0.022) during the hospital stay. During the 2 weeks after discharge, women who birthed by NELUSCS had higher mean pain scores (6.5 vs. 4.6 ELUSCS, p p = 0.017). Breastfeeding status at study completion was not associated with CS birth type (19.6% ELUSCS vs. 19% NELUSCS, p = 0.99). The study findings indicate that Australian women who give birth by NELUSCS are more likely to experience breastfeeding challenges, with higher rates of infant formula supplementation and a more painful recovery in the days and weeks after birth. In light of the higher postpartum pain scores and lower rates of exclusive breastfeeding, women who birth by NELUSCS need additional postpartum support.
Keywords
