Land (Apr 2024)

Carbon Sequestration Dynamics in Peri-Urban Forests: Comparing Secondary Succession and Mature Stands under Varied Forest Management Practices

  • Cosmin Ion Braga,
  • Stefan Petrea,
  • Gheorghe Raul Radu,
  • Alexandru Bogdan Cucu,
  • Tibor Serban,
  • Alexandru Zaharia,
  • Stefan Leca

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13040492
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 4
p. 492

Abstract

Read online

This study examines the impact of silvicultural and land-use management practices on carbon sequestration in peri-urban forest ecosystems, with a particular focus on human-induced carbon dynamics. The study area’s complex profile spans from a compact native forest to varying degrees of fragmentation. This included areas undergoing secondary succession forest without silvicultural interventions (No-SI) alongside sites subjected to high-intensity (High-SI) and low-intensity silvicultural interventions (Low-SI). The research assessed carbon stocks and sequestration in different carbon pools (living biomass, dead organic matter and soil) using field data, allometric equations and laboratory analysis. Findings reveal a significant correlation between the intensity of anthropogenic interventions and variations in carbon stocks. The CASMOFOR model facilitated the reconstruction of carbon stock and carbon-stock change dynamics over four decades (1980–2022), showing disparities in carbon storage capabilities linked to the structural characteristics of the sites. The Low-SI site had the highest carbon stock in all carbon pools (378 tonnes C ha−1), which is more than double compared to High-SI (161 tonnes C ha−1) or No-SI sites (134 tonnes C ha−1). However, the secondary succession forest (No-SI) demonstrated the highest annual carbon stock change (4.4 tonnes C ha−1 year−1), two times higher than the Low-SI mature stand (2.2 tonnes C ha−1 year−1), emphasising the resilience of forest ecosystems to recover and sustain carbon sequestration capacities after harvesting if forest land use remains unchanged. The study underscores the significant importance of anthropogenic interventions on carbon dynamics, especially for living tree biomass, which has consequences in enhancing carbon sequestration and contributing to emission reduction targets.

Keywords