eLife (Jan 2024)

Design of the HPV-automated visual evaluation (PAVE) study: Validating a novel cervical screening strategy

  • Silvia de Sanjosé,
  • Rebecca B Perkins,
  • Nicole Campos,
  • Federica Inturrisi,
  • Didem Egemen,
  • Brian Befano,
  • Ana Cecilia Rodriguez,
  • Jose Jerónimo,
  • Li C Cheung,
  • Kanan Desai,
  • Paul Han,
  • Akiva P Novetsky,
  • Abigail Ukwuani,
  • Jenna Marcus,
  • Syed Rakin Ahmed,
  • Nicolas Wentzensen,
  • Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer,
  • Mark Schiffman,
  • On behalf of the PAVE Study Group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91469
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

Background: The HPV-automated visual evaluation (PAVE) Study is an extensive, multinational initiative designed to advance cervical cancer prevention in resource-constrained regions. Cervical cancer disproportionally affects regions with limited access to preventive measures. PAVE aims to assess a novel screening-triage-treatment strategy integrating self-sampled HPV testing, deep-learning-based automated visual evaluation (AVE), and targeted therapies. Methods: Phase 1 efficacy involves screening up to 100,000 women aged 25–49 across nine countries, using self-collected vaginal samples for hierarchical HPV evaluation: HPV16, else HPV18/45, else HPV31/33/35/52/58, else HPV39/51/56/59/68 else negative. HPV-positive individuals undergo further evaluation, including pelvic exams, cervical imaging, and biopsies. AVE algorithms analyze images, assigning risk scores for precancer, validated against histologic high-grade precancer. Phase 1, however, does not integrate AVE results into patient management, contrasting them with local standard care. Results: Currently, sites have commenced fieldwork, and conclusive results are pending. Conclusions: The study aspires to validate a screen-triage-treat protocol utilizing innovative biomarkers to deliver an accurate, feasible, and cost-effective strategy for cervical cancer prevention in resource-limited areas. Should the study validate PAVE, its broader implementation could be recommended, potentially expanding cervical cancer prevention worldwide. Funding: The consortial sites are responsible for their own study costs. Research equipment and supplies, and the NCI-affiliated staff are funded by the National Cancer Institute Intramural Research Program including supplemental funding from the Cancer Cures Moonshot Initiative. No commercial support was obtained. Brian Befano was supported by NCI/ NIH under Grant T32CA09168.

Keywords