BMC Neurology (Aug 2023)

Core protocol development for phase 2/3 clinical trials in the leukodystrophy vanishing white matter: a consensus statement by the VWM consortium and patient advocates

  • Daphne H. Schoenmakers,
  • Prisca S. Leferink,
  • Adeline Vanderver,
  • Joshua L. Bonkowsky,
  • Ingeborg Krägeloh-Mann,
  • Geneviève Bernard,
  • Enrico Bertini,
  • Ali Fatemi,
  • Brent L. Fogel,
  • Nicole I. Wolf,
  • Donna Skwirut,
  • Allyson Buck,
  • Brett Holberg,
  • Elise F. Saunier-Vivar,
  • Robert Rauner,
  • Hanka Dekker,
  • Pieter van Bokhoven,
  • Menno D. Stellingwerff,
  • Johannes Berkhof,
  • Marjo S. van der Knaap

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03354-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 15

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The leukodystrophy “Vanishing White Matter” (VWM) is an orphan disease with neurological decline and high mortality. Currently, VWM has no approved treatments, but advances in understanding pathophysiology have led to identification of promising therapies. Several investigational medicinal products are either in or about to enter clinical trial phase. Clinical trials in VWM pose serious challenges, as VWM has an episodic disease course; disease phenotype is highly heterogeneous and predictable only for early onset; and study power is limited by the small patient numbers. To address these challenges and accelerate therapy delivery, the VWM Consortium, a group of academic clinicians with expertise in VWM, decided to develop a core protocol to function as a template for trials, to improve trial design and facilitate sharing of control data, while permitting flexibility regarding other trial details. Overall aims of the core protocol are to collect safety, tolerability, and efficacy data for treatment assessment and marketing authorization. Methods To develop the core protocol, the VWM Consortium designated a committee, including clinician members of the VWM Consortium, family and patient group advocates, and experts in statistics, clinical trial design and alliancing with industries. We drafted three age-specific protocols, to stratify into more homogeneous patient groups, of ages ≥ 18 years, ≥ 6 to < 18 years and < 6 years. We chose double‐blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design for patients aged ≥ 6 years; and open-label non-randomized natural-history-controlled design for patients < 6 years. The protocol describes study populations, age-specific endpoints, inclusion and exclusion criteria, study schedules, sample size determinations, and statistical considerations. Discussion The core protocol provides a shared uniformity across trials, enables a pool of shared controls, and reduces the total number of patients necessary per trial, limiting the number of patients on placebo. All VWM clinical trials are suggested to adhere to the core protocol. Other trial components such as choice of primary outcome, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and biomarkers are flexible and unconstrained by the core protocol. Each sponsor is responsible for their trial execution, while the control data are handled by a shared research organization. This core protocol benefits the efficiency of parallel and consecutive trials in VWM, and we hope accelerates time to availability of treatments for VWM. Trial registration NA. From a scientific and ethical perspective, it is strongly recommended that all interventional trials using this core protocol are registered in a clinical trial register.

Keywords