Journal of Clinical Medicine (Jul 2020)

A Retrospective Comparison of DLI and gDLI for Post-Transplant Treatment

  • Sylvain Lamure,
  • Franciane Paul,
  • Anne-Laure Gagez,
  • Jérémy Delage,
  • Laure Vincent,
  • Nathalie Fegueux,
  • Anne Sirvent,
  • Eve Gehlkopf,
  • Jean Luc Veyrune,
  • Lu Zhao Yang,
  • Tarik Kanouni,
  • Valère Cacheux,
  • Jérôme Moreaux,
  • Beatrice Bonafoux,
  • Guillaume Cartron,
  • John De Vos,
  • Patrice Ceballos

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072204
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 7
p. 2204

Abstract

Read online

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is used to prevent or treat haematological malignancies relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulated factor primed DLI (gDLI) is derived from frozen aliquots of the peripheral blood stem cell collection. We compared the efficacy and safety of gDLI and classical DLI after allo-SCT. We excluded haploidentical allo-SCT. Initial diseases were acute myeloblastic leukaemia (n = 45), myeloma (n = 38), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (n = 20), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 10), myelodysplasia (n = 8), Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 8), chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (n = 7), chronic myeloid leukaemia (n = 2) and osteomyelofibrosis (n = 1). Indications for DLI were relapse (n = 96) or pre-emptive treatment (n = 43). Sixty-eight patients had classical DLI and 71 had gDLI. The response rate was 38.2%, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 38% (29–48) and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 37% (29–47). Graft versus host disease rate was 46.7% and 10.1% of patients died from toxicity. There were no differences between classical DLI and gDLI in terms of response (p = 0.28), 5-year PFS (p = 0.90), 5-year OS (p. 0.50), GvHD (p = 0.86), treated GvHD (p = 0.81) and cause of mortality (p. 0.14). In conclusion, this study points out no major effectiveness or toxicity of gDLI compared to classical DLI.

Keywords