Scientific Reports (Sep 2021)

Air seal performance of personalized and statistically shaped 3D-printed face masks compared with market-available surgical and FFP2 masks

  • Julian Nold,
  • Marc C. Metzger,
  • Steffen Schwarz,
  • Christian Wesemann,
  • Gregor Wemken,
  • Stefano Pieralli,
  • Florian Kernen,
  • Julia Weingart,
  • Carl G. Schirmeister,
  • Stefan Schumann,
  • Stefan Schlager,
  • Benedikt C. Spies

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98963-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has revealed alarming shortages of personal protective equipment for frontline healthcare professionals and the general public. Therefore, a 3D-printable mask frame was developed, and its air seal performance was evaluated and compared. Personalized masks (PM) based on individual face scans (n = 8) and a statistically shaped mask (SSM) based on a standardized facial soft tissue shape computed from 190 face scans were designed. Subsequently, the masks were additively manufactured, and in a second step, the PM and SSM were compared to surgical masks (SM) and FFP2 masks (FFP2) in terms of air seal performance. 3D-printed face models allowed for air leakage evaluation by measuring the pressure inside the mask in sealed and unsealed conditions during a breathing simulation. The PM demonstrated the lowest leak flow (p 0.68). The developed framework allows for the time- and resource-efficient, on-demand, and in-house production of masks. For the best seal performance, an individually personalized mask design might be recommended.