Journal of Clinical Medicine (Nov 2020)

What Type of Patients Did PARAGON-HF Select? Insights from a Real-World Prospective Cohort of Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

  • René Rettl,
  • Theresa-Marie Dachs,
  • Franz Duca,
  • Christina Binder,
  • Fabian Dusik,
  • Benjamin Seirer,
  • Johannes Schönauer,
  • Christina Kronberger,
  • Luciana Camuz Ligios,
  • Christian Hengstenberg,
  • Nina Derkits,
  • Johannes Kastner,
  • Roza Badr Eslam,
  • Diana Bonderman

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113669
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 11
p. 3669

Abstract

Read online

The PARAGON-HF clinical trial suggested that sacubitril/valsartan may become a treatment option for particular subgroups of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the proportion of real-world HFpEF patients who are theoretically superimposable with the PARAGON-HF population is yet unknown. The present study was performed to define the proportion of real-world PARAGON-HF-like patients and to describe their clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis in comparison with those who would not meet PARAGON-HF criteria. We systematically applied PARAGON-HF inclusion and exclusion criteria to a total of 427 HFpEF patients who have been participating in a prospective national registry between December 2010 and December 2019. In total, only 170 (39.8%) registry patients were theoretically eligible for PARAGON-HF. Patients not meeting inclusion criteria (41.0%) were less impaired with respect to exercise capacity (median 6-min walk distance: 385 m (IQR: 300–450) versus 323 m (IQR: 240–383); p p p p p p = 0.037). We demonstrate here that < 40% of real-world HFpEF patients meet eligibility criteria for PARAGON-HF. We conclude that despite reasons for optimism after PARAGON-HF, a large proportion of HFpEF patients will remain without meaningful treatment options.

Keywords