Cancer Reports (Feb 2024)

The value of preoperative neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, and red blood cell distribution width in predicting positive surgical margin after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

  • Hao Wang,
  • Dawei Xie,
  • Siqi Wang,
  • Liyang Wu,
  • Yifan Chu,
  • Pushen Yang,
  • Weifeng He,
  • Jianwen Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1977
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 2
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignant tumors in men, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is commonly used to treat localized and advanced PCa. Positive surgical margin (PSM) is one of the most frequent problems faced by surgeons. Aims This study aimed to explore the value of the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in predicting PSM after LRP. Methods and Results Three hundred and twenty patients with PCa were admitted and underwent LRP in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from January 2017 to June 2023. Patients were randomly divided into a training set (225 cases) and a validation set (95 cases) in a 7:3 ratio. NLR, PLR, and RDW were significantly higher in the PSM group than in the negative surgical margins (NSM) group. In addition, the NLR, PLR, and RDW values correlated with clinical T stage, Gleason score, and seminal vesicle invasion in the PSM group. In training set, ROC curve analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff values of NLR, PLR, and RDW for predicting postoperative PSM in PCa were 2.31, 115.40, and 12.85%, respectively. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed NLR and RDW were the clinical independent predictors. The area under the curve (AUC, 0.770, 95% CI 0.709–0.831) for postoperative PSM was the highest when a combination of the three parameters was used, with sensitivity and specificity of 62.5% and 85.2%, respectively. In validation set, the AUC values for NLR, PLR, RDW and the three markers combined were 0.708, 0.675, 0.723, and 0.780, respectively. Correlation analysis showed that in the PSM group, NLR was positively correlated with PLR and RDW, and PLR was positively correlated with RDW. By contrast, in the NSM group, a positive association was only found between NLR and PLR. Conclusions Higher preoperative NLR, PLR, and RDW values were associated with postoperative PSM. Additionally, the three markers combined may be useful to predict PSM.

Keywords