Frontiers in Immunology (Aug 2024)

Use of Janus kinase inhibitors before and after European Medicines Agency safety recommendations: a retrospective study

  • Patrick-Pascal Strunz,
  • Linus Maximilian Risser,
  • Matthias Englbrecht,
  • Torsten Witte,
  • Matthias Froehlich,
  • Marc Schmalzing,
  • Michael Gernert,
  • Sebastian Hueper,
  • Peter Bartz-Bazzanella,
  • Peter Bartz-Bazzanella,
  • Peter Bartz-Bazzanella,
  • Cay von der Decken,
  • Cay von der Decken,
  • Cay von der Decken,
  • Cay von der Decken,
  • Kirsten Karberg,
  • Kirsten Karberg,
  • Georg Gauler,
  • Georg Gauler,
  • Susanna Späthling-Mestekemper,
  • Susanna Späthling-Mestekemper,
  • Christoph Kuhn,
  • Christoph Kuhn,
  • Wolfgang Vorbrüggen,
  • Wolfgang Vorbrüggen,
  • Martin Welcker,
  • Martin Welcker,
  • Stefan Kleinert,
  • Stefan Kleinert,
  • Stefan Kleinert

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1445680
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundSafety recommendations for Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) issued by the European Medical Agency (EMA) in 2023 could potentially influence treatment patterns for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) drugs, but little is known about the impact of these recommendations in routine clinical care.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the German RHADAR rheumatology database for adult patients with RA and documentation of a new therapy with a JAKi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), or interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ri). Data were grouped into half-yearly intervals from quarter (Q)2/2020 to Q3/2023. The period from Q4/2022 to Q1/2023 immediately followed the initial EMA endorsement of Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) recommendations and Q2/2023-Q3/2023 immediately followed the direct healthcare provider communication (DHPC) containing the new safety JAKi recommendations.ResultsBetween April 1, 2020 and September 23, 2023, 3008 newly initiated therapies for TNFi (1499 [49.8%]), JAKi (1126 [37.4%]), and IL-6Ri (383 [12.7%]) were documented by the treating physicians. JAKi were increasingly used in the first two half-year periods (from 29.7% of these therapies in Q2/2020-Q3/2020 to 46.7% in Q2/2021-Q3/2021; odds ratio [OR] 2.08; p<0.001). The proportion of initiated JAKi therapies decreased significantly after the PRAC recommendations (32.9%; OR vs peak 0.56; p=0.001) and the DHPC letter (26.1%; OR vs peak 0.40; p<0.001). JAKi were more likely to be used as >3rd-line therapy in later time periods.ConclusionsThis exploratory study suggests that EMA safety recommendations for JAKi influenced treatment patterns of RA patients who received JAKi in Germany. Additional studies will be needed to confirm these findings.

Keywords