Scientific Reports (May 2018)

Quantum conductance-temperature phase diagram of granular superconductor K x Fe2−y Se2

  • C. C. Soares,
  • M. ElMassalami,
  • Y. Yanagisawa,
  • M. Tanaka,
  • H. Takeya,
  • Y. Takano

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25052-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract It is now well established that the microstructure of Fe-based chalcogenide K x Fe2−y Se2 consists of, at least, a minor (~15 percent), nano-sized, superconducting K s Fe2Se2 phase and a major (~85 percent) insulating antiferromagnetic K2Fe4Se5 matrix. Other intercalated A 1−x Fe2−y Se2 (A = Li, Na, Ba, Sr, Ca, Yb, Eu, ammonia, amide, pyridine, ethylenediamine etc.) manifest a similar microstructure. On subjecting each of these systems to a varying control parameter (e.g. heat treatment, concentration x,y, or pressure p), one obtains an exotic normal-state and superconducting phase diagram. With the objective of rationalizing the properties of such a diagram, we envisage a system consisting of nanosized superconducting granules which are embedded within an insulating continuum. Then, based on the standard granular superconductor model, an induced variation in size, distribution, separation and Fe-content of the superconducting granules can be expressed in terms of model parameters (e.g. tunneling conductance, g, Coulomb charging energy, E c , superconducting gap of single granule, Δ, and Josephson energy J = πΔg/2). We show, with illustration from experiments, that this granular scenario explains satisfactorily the evolution of normal-state and superconducting properties (best visualized on a $${\boldsymbol{g}}{\boldsymbol{-}}\frac{{{\boldsymbol{E}}}_{{\boldsymbol{c}}}}{{\boldsymbol{\Delta }}}{\boldsymbol{-}}{\boldsymbol{T}}$$ g−EcΔ−T phase diagram) of A x Fe2−y Se2 when any of x, y, p, or heat treatment is varied.