Clinical performance and quality measures for heart failure management in China: the China‐Heart Failure registry study

Abstract

Abstract Aims Heart failure (HF) remains a major public health problem with increasing prevalence in China. This study evaluated the clinical performance and quality measures for HF management to identify gaps in the standardization of care for patients hospitalized for HF in China. Methods and results Following the results of China‐HF stage I (2012–2015), the second stage of the China‐HF was launched in 2017. Among 113 hospitals with ≥100 cases, the China‐HF Stage II assessed the quality of care measures for HF and compared results with previous data in China and the US‐based Get with The Guidelines‐Heart Failure (GWTG‐HF) registries. In total, 34 938 patients hospitalized with HF were enrolled from January 2017 to October 2020. Echocardiographic left ventricular function and natriuretic peptide test were performed in 93.7% and 93.0% of the cases, respectively. Adherence to standardized guidelines in China‐HF stage II was higher than that in the China‐HF stage I, but generally lower than GWTG‐HF registry with 78.2% of eligible patients was prescribed oral diuretics, 78.7% renin‐angiotensin‐system inhibitors, and 82.2% beta‐blockers. Implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization devices were implanted in 3.9% and 14.6%, respectively. In contrast, the proportion of eligible patients discharged with spironolactone (87.8%) was higher than GWTG‐HF. The median length of hospitalization was 9 (6, 12) days, and 938 (2.8%) patients died or withdrew from treatment during hospitalization. Conclusions Despite significant improvements in the use of guideline‐recommended testing and therapy, there remain major gaps in quality of care for patients hospitalized for HF in China that are generally larger than gaps observed in the United States.

Keywords

• Heart failure
• Medical union
• Clinical performance
• Quality measures
• Quality improvement