Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism (Apr 2024)

The Effect of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills on Learning and Satisfaction of Students in Community Dentistry Course

  • FATEMEH DABAGHI TABRIZ,
  • AYLA BAHRAMIAN,
  • SAEEDE ASDAGH,
  • FARNAZ GHADIMI,
  • KATAYOUN KATEBI

DOI
https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2023.100431.1890
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 2
pp. 111 – 117

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Direct Observation of Practical Skills (DOPS) tests is a valuable method for clinical assessment. This study aimed to implement the DOPS test to assess the procedural skills ofcommunity dentistry courses and its effects on mastery learning and satisfaction of professors and students at Tabriz faculty of dentistry in 2021-2022.Methods: In a quasi-experimental study, 60 dentistry students of a class were assigned into two study (n=30) and control (n=30) groups by Permuted block randomization. In the case group, theskills were related to Fluoride therapy, fissure sealant therapy, and health education evaluated by DOPS. In the control group, these skills were evaluated by traditional evaluation methods. Each test was repeated three times. Finally, the satisfaction of students in the case group was assessed by a questionnaire. The chi-square test was used to compare qualitative variables. Repeated measure ANOVA test was used to compare the mean scores in three stages and two groups. P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16 software.Results: A significant difference in the mean score of Fluoride therapy, pit and fissure sealant therapy, and health education was seen between the case and control groups (P<0.001).Also a significant increase in these skills in the third stage of assessment in the case group was observed (P<0.001). The professors and students’ satisfaction was considerably high onthe DOPS test.Conclusion: The DOPS method had more impact on Fluoride therapy, pit and fissure sealant therapy, and health education's learning process in dentistry students than the conventionalevaluation. The professors and students’ satisfaction level was high regarding DOPS. The advantages of the DOPS method are student-centeredness, objectivity, and appropriate feedback.

Keywords