mAbs (Dec 2024)

A comparative study of the developability of full-length antibodies, fragments, and bispecific formats reveals higher stability risks for engineered constructs

  • Itzel Condado-Morales,
  • Fabian Dingfelder,
  • Isabel Waibel,
  • Oliver M. Turnbull,
  • Bhargav Patel,
  • Zheng Cao,
  • Jais Rose Bjelke,
  • Susanne Nedergaard Grell,
  • Anja Bennet,
  • Alissa M. Hummer,
  • Matthew I. J. Raybould,
  • Charlotte M. Deane,
  • Thomas Egebjerg,
  • Nikolai Lorenzen,
  • Paolo Arosio

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2024.2403156
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Engineered antibody formats, such as antibody fragments and bispecifics, have the potential to offer improved therapeutic efficacy compared to traditional full-length monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). However, the translation of these non-natural molecules into successful therapeutics can be hampered by developability challenges. Here, we systematically analyzed 64 different antibody constructs targeting Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) which cover 8 distinct molecular format families, encompassing full-length antibodies, various types of single chain variable fragments, and bispecifics. We measured 15 biophysical properties related to activity, manufacturing, and stability, scoring variants with a flag-based risk approach and a recent in silico developability profiler. Our comparative assessment revealed that overall developability is higher for the natural full-length antibody format. Bispecific antibodies, antibodies with scFv fragments at the C-terminus of the light chain, and single-chain Fv antibody fragments (scFvs) have intermediate developability properties, while more complicated formats, such as scFv- scFv, bispecific mAbs with one Fab exchanged with a scFv, and diabody formats are collectively more challenging. In particular, our study highlights the propensity for fragmentation and aggregation, both in bulk and at interfaces, for many current engineered formats.

Keywords