Journal of Translational Medicine (May 2023)

A novel Chr1-miR-200 driven whole transcriptome signature shapes tumor immune microenvironment and predicts relapse in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma

  • Simon Garinet,
  • Audrey Didelot,
  • Laetitia Marisa,
  • Guillaume Beinse,
  • Marine Sroussi,
  • Françoise Le Pimpec-Barthes,
  • Elizabeth Fabre,
  • Laure Gibault,
  • Pierre Laurent-Puig,
  • Sophie Mouillet-Richard,
  • Antoine Legras,
  • Hélène Blons

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04086-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background In Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), targeted therapies and immunotherapies have moved from metastatic to early stage and stratification of the relapse risk becomes mandatory. Here we identified a miR-200 based RNA signature that delineates Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) heterogeneity and predicts survival beyond current classification systems. Methods A miR-200 signature was identified using RNA sequencing. We scored the miR-200 signature by WISP (Weighted In Silico Pathology), used GSEA to identify pathway enrichments and MCP-counter to characterize immune cell infiltrates. We evaluate the clinical value of this signature in our series of LUAD and using TCGA and 7 published datasets. Results We identified 3 clusters based on supervised classification: I is miR-200-sign-down and enriched in TP53 mutations IIA and IIB are miR-200-sign-up: IIA is enriched in EGFR (p < 0.001), IIB is enriched in KRAS mutation (p < 0.001). WISP stratified patients into miR-200-sign-down (n = 65) and miR-200-sign-up (n = 42). Several biological processes were enriched in MiR-200-sign-down tumors, focal adhesion, actin cytoskeleton, cytokine/receptor interaction, TP53 signaling and cell cycle pathways. Fibroblast, immune cell infiltration and PDL1 expression were also significantly higher suggesting immune exhaustion. This signature stratified patients into high-vs low-risk groups, miR-200-sign-up had higher DFS, median not reached at 60 vs 41 months and within subpopulations with stage I, IA, IB, or II. Results were validated on TCGA data on 7 public datasets. Conclusion This EMT and miR-200-related prognostic signature refines prognosis evaluation independently of tumor stage and paves the way towards assessing the predictive value of this LUAD clustering to optimize perioperative treatment.

Keywords