BMC Health Services Research (Oct 2016)

Effects of financial support on treatment of adolescents with growth hormone deficiency: a retrospective study in Japan

  • Eri Maeda,
  • Takahiro Higashi,
  • Tomonobu Hasegawa,
  • Susumu Yokoya,
  • Takahiro Mochizuki,
  • Tomohiro Ishii,
  • Junko Ito,
  • Susumu Kanzaki,
  • Akira Shimatsu,
  • Koji Takano,
  • Toshihiro Tajima,
  • Hiroyuki Tanaka,
  • Yusuke Tanahashi,
  • Akira Teramoto,
  • Toshiro Nagai,
  • Kunihiko Hanew,
  • Reiko Horikawa,
  • Toru Yorifuji,
  • Naohiro Wada,
  • Toshiaki Tanaka

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1854-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Treatment costs for children with growth hormone (GH) deficiency are subsidized by the government in Japan if the children meet clinical criteria, including height limits (boys: 156.4 cm; girls: 145.4 cm). However, several funding programs, such as a subsidy provided by local governments, can be used by those who exceed the height limits. In this study, we explored the impacts of financial support on GH treatment using this natural allocation. Methods A retrospective analysis of 696 adolescent patients (451 boys and 245 girls) who reached the height limits was conducted. Associations between financial support and continuing treatment were assessed using multiple logistic regression analyses adjusting for age, sex, height, growth velocity, bone age, and adverse effects. Results Of the 696 children in the analysis, 108 (15.5 %) were still eligible for financial support. The proportion of children who continued GH treatment was higher among those who were eligible for support than among those who were not (75.9 % vs. 52.0 %, P < 0.001). The odds ratios of financial support to continuing treatment were 4.04 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.86–8.78) in boys and 1.72 (95 % CI: 0.80–3.70) in girls, after adjusting for demographic characteristics and clinical factors. Conclusions Financial support affected decisions on treatment continuation for children with GH deficiency. Geographic variations in eligibility for financial support pose an ethical problem that needs policy attention. An appropriate balance between public spending on continuation of therapy and improved quality of life derived from it should be explored.

Keywords