Frontiers in Public Health (Sep 2022)

Perceived access to general and mental healthcare in primary care in Colombia during COVID-19: A cross-sectional study

  • Carlos Gómez-Restrepo,
  • Carlos Gómez-Restrepo,
  • Magda Cepeda,
  • William C. Torrey,
  • Fernando Suarez-Obando,
  • José Miguel Uribe-Restrepo,
  • Sena Park,
  • María Paula Jassir Acosta,
  • Pablo Martínez Camblor,
  • Sergio M. Castro,
  • Jeny Aguilera-Cruz,
  • Lilian González,
  • Natalia Chaparro,
  • Ana María Gómez-Gamez,
  • Kathleen Bell,
  • Lisa A. Marsch

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.896318
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact both in general and mental healthcare, challenged the health systems worldwide, and affected their capacity to deliver essential health services. We aimed to describe perceived changes in ease of access to general and mental healthcare among patients with a diagnosis of depression and/or unhealthy alcohol use in Colombia.MethodsThis study is embedded in the DIADA project, a multicenter implementation research study aimed at evaluating the integration of mental healthcare in primary care in Colombia. Between November 2020 and August 2021, we conducted a COVID-19 pandemic impact assessment in a cohort of participants with newly diagnosed depression and/or unhealthy alcohol use part of DIADA project. We assessed the ease of access and factors related to perceived ease of access to general or mental healthcare, during the COVID-19 pandemic.Results836 participants completed the COVID-19 pandemic impact assessment. About 30% of participants considered their mental health to be worse during the pandemic and 84.3% perceived access to general healthcare to be worse during the pandemic. Most of participants (85.8%) were unable to assess access to mental health services, but a significant proportion considered it to be worse. Experiencing worse ease of access to general healthcare was more frequent among women, patients with diagnosis of depression, and patients with comorbidities. Experiencing worse ease of access to mental healthcare was more frequent among patients aged between 30 and 49.9 years, from socioeconomic status between 4 and 6, affiliated to the contributive social security regime, attending urban study sites, and those who perceived their mental health was worse during the pandemic.DiscussionDespite the overall perception of worse mental health during the pandemic, the use of mental healthcare was low compared to general healthcare. Ease of access was perceived to be worse compared to pre-pandemic. Ease of access and access were affected by geographical study site, socioeconomic status, age and gender. Our findings highlight the need for improved communication between patients and institutions, tailored strategies to adapt the healthcare provision to patients' characteristics, and continued efforts to strengthen the role of mental healthcare provision in primary care.

Keywords