Prevalence and Clinical Outcomes of Eosinophilic COPD in a Saudi Population: A Retrospective Study

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed the prevalence of eosinophilic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among a selected Saudi population and examined its correlation with baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, exacerbation risk, and current management. Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-center study was conducted over a 2-year period. The patients were divided into two groups based on the blood eosinophil count at the time of diagnosis: eosinophilic COPD (≥300 cells/μl) and non-eosinophilic COPD (0.05). Besides, there were no significant differences between both groups regarding the frequency and numbers of exacerbations, emergency room visits, in-patient hospitalizations, and intensive care unit admissions (for all, P >0.05). Among patients with eosinophilic COPD, 64 patients (84.2%) were correctly receiving the triple therapy of long-acting β2 agonists + long-acting muscarinic antagonist + inhaled corticosteroids, whereas 4 patients (5.26%) were incorrectly receiving the dual therapy of long-acting β2 agonists + inhaled corticosteroids. Univariate regression analyses revealed that heart failure, GOLD 3 severity, use of triple therapy, and use of non-invasive ventilation were significantly correlated with a higher risk of COPD exacerbation. Conversely, higher FEV1 was significantly correlated with lower risk of COPD exacerbation. The eosinophilic COPD phenotype was not found to be a significant independent variable of COPD exacerbation. Conclusion: This study found that among Saudi patients with COPD, there was no clinically important relationship between baseline blood eosinophil count and the rate of exacerbation.

Keywords

• chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
• eosinophil
• exacerbation
• inhaled corticosteroids
• saudi arabia