Известия Томского политехнического университета: Инжиниринг георесурсов (Apr 2024)

“Core–core” petrophysical relationships generation for reservoir modeling

  • Mikhail O. Korovin,
  • Anna O. Aleeva

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2024/4/4539
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 335, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Relevance. The need in a detailed analysis of distribution of physical properties of the formation in space. Currently, the parameters connecting the results of responses of geophysical fields and petrophysical studies of core are averaged. On the one hand, this is due to the small number of wells with cores in the fields, and on the other hand, to simplify and speed up calculations in the presence of a large number of wells with geophysical surveys of wells. However, this approach does not allow us to identify the largest number of a particular layer or section characteristics. This, in its turn, may lead to inaccuracies in calculating filtration and capacitance properties. When averaging parameters, the features of formation of the deposit in parts of the field with core sampling are lost. And this is a very big opportunity to more accurately form facies models of deposits. Aims. To generate a map of skeletal density distribution based on core data for the supra-coal strata of a terrigenous oil reservoir; analyze the resulting distribution map, identify areas with increased and decreased density values; assess the degree of change in the porosity coefficient when compared with density values; identify areas of high and low density and trends. Object. Supra-coal strata of terrigenous sediments of one of the layers of an oil field in the Tomsk region. Methods. Analysis of the petrophysical database leads to formation of an idea of the reservoir. Laboratory core studies are the source of the most reliable information about the filtration and reservoir properties of the formation. The analysis technique involves the well-by-well construction of dependencies of petrophysical parameters and determination of the value of the constant density of the skeleton. Additionally, a general relationship is built for all wells to compare values and identify maximum and minimum parameters boundaries, skeletal density distribution map and resulting zones with low- and high-density values analysis. Borehole differentiation of values leads to increased detail of the distribution of the studied parameter and identification of zones with abnormally high and low values for more detailed study and the formation of a conceptual geological model.

Keywords