Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (Jun 2022)

Accounting for Stimulations That Do Not Elicit Motor-Evoked Potentials When Mapping Cortical Representations of Multiple Muscles

  • Fang Jin,
  • Fang Jin,
  • Sjoerd M. Bruijn,
  • Sjoerd M. Bruijn,
  • Andreas Daffertshofer,
  • Andreas Daffertshofer

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.920538
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16

Abstract

Read online

The representation of muscles in the cortex can be mapped using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. The commonly employed measure to quantify the mapping are the center of gravity or the centroid of the region of excitability as well as its size. Determining these measures typically relies only on stimulation points that yield motor-evoked potentials (MEPs); stimulations that do not elicit an MEP, i.e., non-MEP points, are ignored entirely. In this study, we show how incorporating non-MEP points may affect the estimates of the size and centroid of the excitable area in eight hand and forearm muscles after mono-phasic single-pulse TMS. We performed test-retest assessments in twenty participants and estimated the reliability of centroids and sizes of the corresponding areas using inter-class correlation coefficients. For most muscles, the reliability turned out good. As expected, removing the non-MEP points significantly decreased area sizes and area weights, suggesting that conventional approaches that do not account for non-MEP points are likely to overestimate the regions of excitability.

Keywords