European Radiology Experimental (Apr 2024)

CEM immediately after contrast-enhanced CT: a one-step staging of breast cancer

  • Antonietta Ancona,
  • Michele Telegrafo,
  • Rita Roberta Fella,
  • Donato Iamele,
  • Sebastiano Cantore,
  • Marco Moschetta

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00440-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a promising technique. We evaluated the diagnostic potential of CEM performed immediately after contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT). Methods Fifty patients with breast cancer underwent first CE-CT and then CEM without additional contrast material injection. Two independent radiologists evaluated CEM images. The sensitivity of CEM for detecting index and additional malignant lesions was compared with that of mammography/ultrasonography by the McNemar test, using histopathology as a reference standard. Interobserver agreement for detection of malignant lesions, for classifying index tumors, and for evaluating index tumor size and extent was assessed using Cohen κ. Pearson correlation was used for correlating index tumor size/extent at CEM or mammography/ultrasonography with histopathology. Results Of the 50 patients, 30 (60%) had unifocal disease while 20 (40%) had multicentric or multifocal disease; 5 of 20 patients with multicentric disease (25%) had bilateral involvement, for a total of 78 malignant lesions, including 72 (92%) invasive ductal and 6 (8%) invasive lobular carcinomas. Sensitivity was 63/78 (81%, 95% confidence interval 70.27–88.82) for unenhanced breast imaging and 78/78 (100%, 95.38–100) for CEM (p < 0.001). The interobserver agreement for overall detection of malignant lesions, for classifying index tumor, and for evaluating index tumor size/extent were 0.94, 0.95, and 0.86 κ, respectively. For index tumor size/extent, correlation coefficients as compared with histological specimens were 0.50 for mammography/ultrasonography and 0.75 for CEM (p ≤ 0.010). Conclusions CEM acquired immediately after CE-CT without injection of additional contrast material showed a good performance for local staging of breast cancer. Relevance statement When the CEM suite is near to the CE-CT acquisition room, CEM acquired immediately after, without injection of additional contrast material, could represent a way for local staging of breast cancer to be explored in larger prospective studies. Key points • CEM represents a new accurate tool in the field of breast imaging. • An intravenous injection of iodine-based contrast material is required for breast gland evaluation. • CEM after CE-CT could provide a one-stop tool for breast cancer staging. Graphical Abstract

Keywords