Assessment of Cervical Myelopathy Risk in Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Patients With Spinal Cord Compression Based on Segmental Dynamic Versus Static Factors
Zhongyuan He,
Nguyen Tran Canh Tung,
Hiroto Makino,
Taketoshi Yasuda,
Shoji Seki,
Kayo Suzuki,
Kenta Watanabe,
Hayato Futakawa,
Katsuhiko Kamei,
Yoshiharu Kawaguchi
Affiliations
Zhongyuan He
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
Nguyen Tran Canh Tung
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
Hiroto Makino
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
Taketoshi Yasuda
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
Shoji Seki
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
Kayo Suzuki
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
Kenta Watanabe
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
Hayato Futakawa
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
Katsuhiko Kamei
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
Yoshiharu Kawaguchi
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
Objective Using segmental dynamic and static factors, we aimed to elucidate the pathogenesis and relationship between ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and the severity of cervical myelopathy. Methods Retrospective analysis of 163 OPLL patients' 815 segments. Imaging was used to evaluate each segmental space available for the spinal cord (SAC), OPLL diameter, type, bone space, K-line, the C2–7 Cobb angle, each segmental range of motion (ROM), and total ROM. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate spinal cord signal intensity. Patients were divided into the myelopathy group (M group) and the without myelopathy group (WM group). Results Minimal SAC (p = 0.043), (C2–7) Cobb angle (p = 0.004), total ROM (p = 0.013), and local ROM (p = 0.022) were evaluated as an independent predictor of myelopathy in OPLL. Different from the previous report, the M group had a straighter whole cervical spine (p 5 mm, the incidence rate of myelopathy decreased with the increase of total ROM. Lower cervical spine (C5–6, C6–7) showing increased “Bridge-Formation,” along with spinal canal stenosis and segmental instability (C2–3, C3–4) in the upper cervical spine, could cause myelopathy in M group (p < 0.05). Conclusion Cervical myelopathy is linked to the OPLL’s narrowest segment and its segmental motion. The hypermobility of the C2–3 and C3–4, contributes significantly to the development of myelopathy in OPLL.