Forests (Mar 2023)

Bibliometric Analysis of Forestry Research in Mexico Published by Mexican Journals

  • Alberto Santillán-Fernández,
  • Nehemias Vásquez-Bautista,
  • Luis Marcelino Pelcastre-Ruiz,
  • Carlos Antonio Ortigoza-García,
  • Edgar Padilla-Herrera,
  • Alfredo Esteban Tadeo-Noble,
  • Eugenio Carrillo-Ávila,
  • José Francisco Juárez-López,
  • Javier Enrique Vera-López,
  • Jaime Bautista-Ortega

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f14030648
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 3
p. 648

Abstract

Read online

There is scarce research assessing the productivity of scientific articles on forestry topics. The objective of this study was to analyze the scientific production on forestry topics that originated in Mexico and were published in Mexican journals from 1996 to 2019 and to identify the causes that determine the impact factor of such publications and the space-time evolution of forestry research in Mexico. In addition, to analyze whether researchers tend to publish in journals published by their affiliation institutions. The study considered 2384 scientific articles from seven journals belonging to category VI of Biotechnology and Agricultural Sciences listed in the Journals Classification System by the National Council of Science and Technology that publishes forestry topics. Bibliometric indicators were generated through text mining and analysis of co-authorship networks. It was found that forestry research in Mexico from 1996 to 2019 presented exponential growth in the number of publications. Forestry scientific production was concentrated in the center of the country. It was dominated by researchers from three of 122 institutions: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (13.88%), Colegio de Postgraduados (12.50%), and Universidad Autonoma Chapingo (10.44%). The journals with the highest number of publications were: Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales (26.51%), Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente (20.34%), and Madera y Bosques (18.88%). Results show that forestry researchers in Mexico published mostly in journals edited by their affiliation institutions, which restricts constructive criticism of peer review and increases academic endogamy. Also showed the need to generate more forestry research for the southeast of the country on topics such as climate change, carbon capture, forest biometry, and remote perception, which are relevant aspects when we consider that no published research evaluated the development of the forestry sector in Mexico.

Keywords