Alternative splicing and alternative polyadenylation define tumor immune microenvironment and pharmacogenomic landscape in clear cell renal carcinoma

Abstract

Two major posttranscriptional mechanisms—alternative splicing (AS) and alternative polyadenylation (APA)—have attracted much attention in cancer research. Nevertheless, their roles in clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) are still ill defined. Herein, this study was conducted to uncover the implications of AS and APA events in ccRCC progression. Through consensus molecular clustering analysis, two AS or APA RNA processing phenotypes were separately constructed with distinct prognosis, tumor-infiltrating immune cells, responses to immunotherapy, and chemotherapy. The AS or APA score was constructed to quantify AS or APA RNA processing patterns of individual ccRCCs with principal-component analysis. Both high AS and APA scores were characterized by undesirable survival outcomes, relatively high response to immunotherapy, and low sensitivity to targeted drugs, such as sorafenib and pazopanib. Moreover, several small molecular compounds were predicted for patients with a high AS or APA score. There was a positive correlation between AS and APA scores. Their interplay contributed to poor prognosis and reshaped the tumor immune microenvironment. Collectively, this study is the first to comprehensively analyze two major posttranscriptional events in ccRCC. Our findings uncovered the potential functions of AS and APA events and identified their therapeutic potential in immunotherapy and targeted therapy.

Keywords

• alternative polyadenylation
• alternative splicing
• clear cell renal carcinoma
• tumor microenvironment
• prognosis
• immunotherapy