Lung India (Jan 2013)

Usefulness of induced sputum eosinophil count to assess severity and treatment outcome in asthma patients

  • Ankan Bandyopadhyay,
  • Partha P Roy,
  • Kaushik Saha,
  • Semanti Chakraborty,
  • Debraj Jash,
  • Debabrata Saha

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.110419
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 30, no. 2
pp. 117 – 123

Abstract

Read online

Context: Currently treatment decisions in asthma are governed by clinical assessment and spirometry. Sputum eosinophil, being a marker of airway inflammation, can serve as a tool for assessing severity and response to treatment in asthma patients. Aims: To establish correlation between change in sputum eosinophil count and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1 ) % predicted value of asthma patients in response to treatment. In this study, we also predicted prognosis and treatment outcome of asthma patients from baseline sputum eosinophil count. Settings and Design: A longitudinal study was conducted to determine the treatment outcome among newly diagnosed asthma patients who were classified into A (n = 80) and B (n = 80) groups on the basis of initial sputum eosinophil count (A ≥ 3% and B < 3%). Materials and Methods: After starting treatment according to Global Initiative for Asthma Guideline, both A and B groups were evaluated every 15 days interval for the 1 st month and monthly thereafter for a total duration of 12 months. In each follow-up visit detailed history, induced sputum eosinophil count and spirometry were done to evaluate severity and treatment outcome. Results: FEV 1 % predicted of group A asthma patients gradually increased and sputum eosinophil count gradually decreased on treatment. Longer time was required to achieve satisfactory improvement (FEV 1 % predicted) in asthma patients with sputum eosinophil count ≥3%. There was statistically significant negative correlation between FEV 1 % predicted and sputum eosinophil count (%) in of group A patients in each follow-up visit, with most significant negative correlation found in 8 th visit (r = −0.9237 and P = < 0.001). Change in mean FEV 1 % (predicted) from baseline showed strong positive correlation (r = 0.976) with change in reduction of mean sputum eosinophil count at each follow-up visits in group A patients. Conclusions: Sputum eosinophil count, being an excellent biomarker of airway inflammation, can serve as a useful marker to assess disease severity, treatment outcome, and prognosis in asthma patients.

Keywords