The Baseline Pan-Immune‑Inflammation Value (PIV) and PILE in Predicting Clinical Outcomes and Therapeutic Response for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Abstract

Ling Duan,1 Wenhui Guo,1 Shuo Yin,1 Shoubo Yang,1 Jie Liu,2 Yunyun Duan,3 Gehong Dong,4 Wenbin Li,1 Feng Chen1 1Department of Neuro-Oncology, Cancer Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Clinical Diagnosis, Laboratory of Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Pathology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Wenbin Li; Feng Chen, Department of Neuro-Oncology, Cancer Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 West Nansihuan Road, Beijing, 100070, People’s Republic of China, Tel [phone], Email [email protected]; [email protected]: To investigate the prognostic significance of pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) and PILE score (based on PIV, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)) in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).Patients and Methods: A total of 109 patients were enrolled. PIV was calculated as follows: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. The PILE score was incorporated based on PIV, LDH levels, and ECOG PS. The Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox hazards regression models were applied for survival analyses. The relationship between PIV, PILE, and therapeutic response was examined.Results: Baseline high PIV was significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) in univariate (HR 3.990, 95% CI 1.778– 8.954, p < 0.001) and multivariate (HR 3.047, 95% CI 1.175– 7.897, p = 0.022) analyses. High PIV was also associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) in univariate (HR 2.121, 95% CI 1.075– 4.186, p = 0.030) but not significant in multivariate analyses. PIV outperformed other systemic inflammation parameters. The patients in the high PILE group (PILE score 2– 3) had worse OS (p = 0.008) and PFS (p < 0.001) compared to the low PILE group (PILE score 0– 1). PILE was independently associated with therapeutic response to initial treatment (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05– 0.46; p < 0.001).Conclusion: High PIV and PILE were correlated with worse clinical outcomes in PCNSL patients, indicating that PIV and PILE might be a powerful predictor of prognosis and a potential predictive indicator for therapeutic response in PCNSL.Keywords: primary central nervous system lymphoma, pan-immune inflammation value, PILE score, prognosis

Keywords

• primary central nervous system lymphoma
• pan-immune inflammation value
• pile score
• prognosis