The Astrophysical Journal (Jan 2023)

Analyses of ∼0.05–2 MeV Ions Associated with the 2022 February 16 Energetic Storm Particle Event Observed by Parker Solar Probe

  • Joe Giacalone,
  • C. M. S. Cohen,
  • D. J. McComas,
  • X. Chen,
  • M. A. Dayeh,
  • W. H. Matthaeus,
  • K. G. Klein,
  • S. D. Bale,
  • E. R. Christian,
  • M. I. Desai,
  • M. E. Hill,
  • L. Y. Khoo,
  • D. Lario,
  • R. A. Leske,
  • R. L. McNutt Jr.,
  • D. G. Mitchell,
  • J. G. Mitchell,
  • O. Malandraki,
  • N. A. Schwadron

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acfb86
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 958, no. 2
p. 144

Abstract

Read online

We present analyses of 0.05–2 MeV ions from the 2022 February 16 energetic storm particle event observed by Parker Solar Probe's (PSP) IS⊙IS/EPI-Lo instrument at 0.35 au from the Sun. This event was characterized by an enhancement in ion fluxes from a quiet background, increasing gradually with time with a nearly flat spectrum, rising sharply near the arrival of the coronal mass ejection (CME)–driven shock, becoming nearly a power-law spectrum, then decaying exponentially afterward, with a rate that was independent of energy. From the observed fluxes, we determine diffusion coefficients, finding that far upstream of the shock the diffusion coefficients are nearly independent of energy, with a value of 10 ^20 cm ^2 s ^−1 . Near the shock, the diffusion coefficients are more than 1 order of magnitude smaller and increase nearly linearly with energy. We also determine the source of energetic particles, by comparing ratios of the intensities at the shock to estimates of the quiet-time intensity to predictions from diffusive shock acceleration theory. We conclude that the source of energetic ions is mostly the solar wind for this event. We also present potential interpretations of the near-exponential decay of the intensity behind the shock. One possibility we suggest is that the shock was overexpanding when it crossed PSP and the energetic particle intensity decreased behind the shock to fill the expanding volume. Overexpanding CMEs could well be more common closer to the Sun, and this is an example of such a case.

Keywords