BMC Anesthesiology (Mar 2023)

Low tidal volume ventilation for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: a secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial

  • Dharshi Karalapillai,
  • Laurence Weinberg,
  • Ary Serpa Neto,
  • Philip J. Peyton,
  • Louise Ellard,
  • Raymond Hu,
  • Brett Pearce,
  • Chong O. Tan,
  • David Story,
  • Mark O’Donnell,
  • Patrick Hamilton,
  • Chad Oughton,
  • Jonathan Galtieri,
  • Anthony Wilson,
  • Grace Liskaser,
  • Ajay Balasubramaniam,
  • Glenn Eastwood,
  • Rinaldo Bellomo,
  • Daryl A. Jones

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-01998-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background We recently reported the results for a large randomized controlled trial of low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) versus conventional tidal volume (CTVV) during major surgery when positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) was equal between groups. We found no difference in postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients who received LTVV. However, in the subgroup of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, LTVV was associated with a numerically lower rate of PPCs after surgery. We aimed to further assess the relationship between LTVV versus CTVV during laparoscopic surgery. Methods We conducted a post-hoc analysis of this pre-specified subgroup. All patients received volume-controlled ventilation with an applied PEEP of 5 cmH2O and either LTVV (6 mL/kg predicted body weight [PBW]) or CTVV (10 mL/kg PBW). The primary outcome was the incidence of a composite of PPCs within seven days. Results Three hundred twenty-eight patients (27.2%) underwent laparoscopic surgeries, with 158 (48.2%) randomised to LTVV. Fifty two of 157 patients (33.1%) assigned to LTVV and 72 of 169 (42.6%) assigned to conventional tidal volume developed PPCs within 7 days (unadjusted absolute difference, − 9.48 [95% CI, − 19.86 to 1.05]; p = 0.076). After adjusting for pre-specified confounders, the LTVV group had a lower incidence of the primary outcome than patients receiving CTVV (adjusted absolute difference, − 10.36 [95% CI, − 20.52 to − 0.20]; p = 0.046). Conclusion In this post-hoc analysis of a large, randomised trial of LTVV we found that during laparoscopic surgeries, LTVV was associated with a significantly reduced PPCs compared to CTVV when PEEP was applied equally between both groups. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry no: 12614000790640.

Keywords